Xero Posted December 15, 2004 Report Share Posted December 15, 2004 ok mr smart pants......i rounded up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TurbochargedBerserker Posted December 15, 2004 Report Share Posted December 15, 2004 ok mr smart pants......i rounded up <{POST_SNAPBACK}> So you can be a Mr. Smart pants too, 1.0L ~= 60.6 ci. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xero Posted December 15, 2004 Report Share Posted December 15, 2004 i did not know that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TurbochargedBerserker Posted December 15, 2004 Report Share Posted December 15, 2004 i did not know that <{POST_SNAPBACK}> That;s why I told ya Lotsa people don't, so don't sweat it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigTex Posted December 15, 2004 Report Share Posted December 15, 2004 Actually.... 1 Liter is just over 61 cubic inches. 61.02374 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigTex Posted December 15, 2004 Report Share Posted December 15, 2004 Oh yeah, for those of you doing the math at home.... our trucks aren't quite a full 6 liters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zippy Posted December 15, 2004 Report Share Posted December 15, 2004 ok mr smart pants......i rounded up i've been called that before. my second brain is located there. richard's right, the 364 isn't an exact 6000cc, it's just based on the estimating system we all learned in elementary school and rounded off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A2Blue Posted December 15, 2004 Report Share Posted December 15, 2004 yep, the LQ9 and all 6.0 L variants are 5967 cc, if anybody's nit-picking . . . Here's a link to GMPT:LQ9 Phew, glad they could round UP, rather than down - wouldn't want to be associated w/ a 5.9 L . . . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zippy Posted December 15, 2004 Report Share Posted December 15, 2004 yep, the LQ9 and all 6.0 L variants are 5967 cc, if anybody's nit-picking . . . Here's a link to GMPT:LQ9 Phew, glad they could round UP, rather than down - wouldn't want to be associated w/ a 5.9 L . . . it would have to be 5850-5949 to be a 5.9 and 5950-6049 to be a 6.0. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TurbochargedBerserker Posted December 15, 2004 Report Share Posted December 15, 2004 That's why I use 60.6 instead of the actual conversion. If you round up the number, it's ussually closer (unless of course the L is the actual size as in the case of 7.0L and 427) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xero Posted December 15, 2004 Report Share Posted December 15, 2004 yep, the LQ9 and all 6.0 L variants are 5967 cc, if anybody's nit-picking . . . Here's a link to GMPT:LQ9 Phew, glad they could round UP, rather than down - wouldn't want to be associated w/ a 5.9 L . . . <{POST_SNAPBACK}> awesome find dude!!!! thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A2Blue Posted December 15, 2004 Report Share Posted December 15, 2004 Good, glad you found that link useful, nice n lo! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dros44 Posted December 15, 2004 Report Share Posted December 15, 2004 SO if i put a 408 stroker kit on my truck....how much hp would i have. WIthout any mods Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zippy Posted December 15, 2004 Report Share Posted December 15, 2004 SO if i put a 408 stroker kit on my truck....how much hp would i have. WIthout any mods you need to shake the 8 ball.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BenKey Posted December 15, 2004 Report Share Posted December 15, 2004 SO if i put a 408 stroker kit on my truck....how much hp would i have. WIthout any mods <{POST_SNAPBACK}> you need to shake the 8 ball.... <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Only been answered ten times in just the last few days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.