Jump to content

Aftermarket vs GM MAF Sensor - Any Real Change?


psualumni

Recommended Posts

Searched for a while and really did't find any big yays or nays. I just recently purchased a JET mass airflow sensor for my 2009 Colbalt SS (LNF 2.0 Turbo) because my GM one went bad (a wire broke). The JET mass airflow sensor looks IDENTICAL to the GM, except for a cute sticker JET put on theirs. I mean even the ink printing on the head plastic, numbers and all. I was wondering if anyone has an after market MAF sensor and really experienced performance gains (seat of the pants dyno, or preferably real dyno). I can't find any after market companies putting up dyno charts showing improvement over the stock MAF sensor.

41f7dGwNIcL._SY300_.jpgvs$T2eC16dHJGwE9n)yUstuBQGt)pw,1w~~60_1.JP

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Jet and Granateli sensors are stock sensors with fancy stickers on them. There is no real gain in changing them. I would go into the long answer of it, but basically leave the stocker in there.

Lol sounds about right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most likely they are recalibrated. I've had it done to older Ford MAF meters in the past.

 

But unless you're maxing out the stock meter, it will do more harm then good, because the ECU is calibrated for the stock flow curve.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...